2004 Beer Report
Slow going in a variable market
by Jamie Popp
Highlights for 2003 in the
beer industry were less than high in most brewers’ eyes and hard on
bottom lines. However, while the Top 10 brands lost market share and both
domestic and per-capita consumption took a turn for the worse, analysts are
predicting an upswing in 2004. Producers are moving into high-gear recovery
after an unpredictable 2003 and taking advantage of American
consumers’ taste for premium beer.
Excluding non-alcohol beverages, Davenport & Co.
LLC estimates domestic consumption dropped 0.7 percent in 2003. Furthermore, the company’s preliminary estimates
from the U.S. Census Bureau show a per-capita consumption decrease from
21.9 gallons per person in 2002 to 21.5 gallons per person in 2003 —
the first drop in per-
capita consumption since 1997. However, what consumers are drinking is costing them more money as they continue to prefer premium beers.
capita consumption since 1997. However, what consumers are drinking is costing them more money as they continue to prefer premium beers.
|
Davenport attributes consumer trade-up to the beer
industry’s recent focus on innovative product offerings and packaging
vs. the rate increases that were more likely to occur in the past. And the
analyst group estimates high-priced, super-premium and premium brands in
aggregate maintained market position last year.
Imports came out on top with a 1.9-percent increase in
consumption during the past year and 0.2-point market share gain in the
category. This is a trend that Davenport expects to continue in 2004.
Future style trends
The strength of imported premium lagers in the United
States pales in comparison to the robust standard lager market, which is
predicted to reach 13.5 billion liters in sales by 2008, according to
Euromonitor International. In fact, standard lager’s overpowering
status among the beer styles in the United
States is expected to protect it from economic
uncertainty. However, Euromonitor also expects its volume sales to decline
by 4.1 percent from 2003 to 2008. Fortunately, the light beer trend is
contributing to a slowdown in the decline of
domestic standard lager consumption in the United States.
Imported premium lagers are expected to see
diminishing volume growth through 2008, however Euromonitor predicts
reductions will be slight due to Americans’ penchant for spending
money on luxury items. Furthermore, premium lager sales are predicted to
grow by 36.5 percent between 2003 and 2008.
Dark beer is forecasted to decline over the next few years due
to economic trends and retail maturation. From 2003 to 2008, dark beer volume
sales are expected to grow by 14.8 percent. Experimentation with dark beer continues
to be a trend among U.S. consumers, however unfamiliarity and the long tradition
of lager-style beer continues to be a hurdle for dark beer in this country,
according to Euromonitor.
Leaders of the tap
Anheuser-Busch, St. Louis, Mo., maintained top honors as the
No. 1 brewer in the United States in 2003. It reported shipments of 103.3 million
barrels, which was an increase of 0.8 percent compared with the previous year,
and it increased its market share points by 0.7, according to Davenport. While
the introduction of Michelob Ultra set off a chain of followers that ultimately
gave the U.S. beer market a needed innovation and sales boost in 2003, the brand
had a cannibalistic effect on Bud Light’s growth. Bud Light’s shipments reportedly
grew 2.5 percent in 2003, down from the 8.2 percent growth it experienced during
2002. Budweiser also declined in shipments to 31.8 million barrels, accounting
for a 3.6 percent decline last year. As the first-to-market producer in the
low-carb craze, Michelob Ultra was the company’s top performer and took 1.5
percent market share, reporting an estimated 3 million barrels shipped vs. the
0.5 million barrels it shipped the previous year.
In 2003, the company also launched Bacardi Silver Raz,
the raspberry-flavored sibling of the Bacardi Silver O3 orange-flavored
malternative, and World Select, Anheuser-Busch’s pilsner beer.
In addition to implementing cost-controlling measures
by "removing barriers between brewers, wholesalers and
retailers," Anheuser Busch’s "Brewery of the Future"
initiative is expected to help the company produce more beer using fewer
resources.
Sliding into the No. 2 spot is Miller Brewing Co.,
Milwaukee, part of the SABMiller family of companies. The company reported
volume at approximately 37.7 million barrels, down from 39 million barrels
in 2002. Losing 0.5 points of market share, Miller has focused its efforts
on reviving the Miller Lite brand through new packaging and advertising
suggesting that it’s a low-carb alternative. As a result, Davenport
is reporting that shipments of Miller Lite could increase by double digits
early this year.
|
Moving forward under new leader Norman Adami,
appointed president and chief executive officer last February, Miller will
be focusing on strengthening its sales and distribution efforts,
prioritizing local markets and improving channel management, according to
the company.
The Adolph Coors Co., Golden, Colo., also was among the companies reporting lackluster results for 2003. Shipments were down 1.3 percent from the previous year, and Davenport estimates the brewer lost 0.1 points of market share compared with 2002. While cornerstone brand Coors Light’s shipments decreased by approximately 1.8 percent last year, Keystone Light showed notable growth.
The Adolph Coors Co., Golden, Colo., also was among the companies reporting lackluster results for 2003. Shipments were down 1.3 percent from the previous year, and Davenport estimates the brewer lost 0.1 points of market share compared with 2002. While cornerstone brand Coors Light’s shipments decreased by approximately 1.8 percent last year, Keystone Light showed notable growth.
It’s unclear whether the introduction of Aspen Edge, Coor’s
low-carb lager, will further take away from Coors Light or enhance the portfolio
of products for the company. Analysts at Smith Barney predict the slow rollout
of Aspen Edge and the timing of the introduction to the low-carb market is not
expected to be a big boost for the company’s profits in 2004.
Interestingly enough, the low-carb beer introduction
downpour seems to have slowed to a trickle. In recent months, many brewers
have decided to test the craze with advertising messages that divert
attention back to light beer brands. Experts say it’s possible that
consumers are confused by the low-carb trend and therefore sticking to
their low-calorie light beers. However, Michelob Ultra clearly shows that a
first-to-market strategy can offer big payoffs among consumers thirsty for
something new.
Similar to last year’s malternative trend that wore off, 2004
could be the year brewers see a downslide in the popularity of low carb.
Global beer sales by value (millions of dollars rsp/hsp*) | |||
Subsector | 1998 | 2003 | 2008 |
Lager | 312,731.7 | 340,212.8 | 374,145.4 |
Premium lager | 72,475.9 | 89,806.0 | 111,815.6 |
Standard lager | 205,351.1 | 203,392.9 | 208,479.1 |
Economy lager | 34,904.8 | 47,013.9 | 53,850.7 |
Dark beer | 22,979.6 | 23,180.1 | 23,436.8 |
Stout | 6,904.3 | 8,167.6 | 8,295.3 |
Non-/low-alcohol | 4,646.1 | 5,077.2 | 5,990.4 |
Total | 347,261.7 | 376,637.7 | 411,868.0 |
*rsp/hsp=retail
selling price/horeca (hotels, restaurants, catering) selling price Source: Euromonitor International - Global Beer Market Information System, 2004 |
Global beer sales by volume (million liters) | |||
Subsector | 1998 | 2003 | 2008 |
Lager | 120,370.8 | 138,370.2 | 159,400.6 |
Premium lager | 17,740.8 | 21,478.8 | 26,093.3 |
Standard lager | 71,035.6 | 74,384.3 | 80,770.7 |
Economy lager | 31,594.3 | 42,507.1 | 52,536.5 |
Dark beer | 6,297.3 | 6,342.8 | 6,385.1 |
Stout | 1,488.2 | 1,805.2 | 2,047.8 |
Non-/low-alcohol | 1,713.9 | 1,841.6 | 2,143.4 |
Total | 129,870.1 | 148,359.7 | 169,976.9 |
Source: Euromonitor International - Global Beer Market Information System, 2004 |
U.S. beer sales by volume (million liters) | ||
1998 | 2003 | |
Lager | 22,423.0 | 23,176.6 |
Premium lager | 3,075.2 | 4,091.8 |
Standard lager | 13,471.9 | 14,124.0 |
Economy lager | 5,875.9 | 4,960.8 |
Dark beer | 371.7 | 455.5 |
Amber Ale | 42.4 | 65.1 |
Other ale | 149.7 | 152.4 |
Pale ale | 121.7 | 165.4 |
Weissbier/weizen/wheat beer | ||
51.1 | 62.3 | |
Other dark beer | 6.8 | 10.3 |
Stout | 95.5 | 113.7 |
Non-/low-alcohol | 191.0 | 133.5 |
Beer | 23,081.2 | 23,879.3 |
Source: Euromonitor International – The Market for Alcoholic Drinks in the USA, 2004 |
U.S. beer sales by value (million dollars) | ||
1998 | 2003 | |
Lager | 56,671.7 | 68,376.6 |
Premium lager | 12,134.1 | 18,545.8 |
Standard lager | 32,160.8 | 38,005.7 |
Economy lager | 12,376.8 | 11,825.1 |
Dark beer | 1,577.3 | 2,171.2 |
Amber Ale | 178.7 | 310.1 |
Other ale | 630.5 | 723.3 |
Pale ale | 495.7 | 757.6 |
Weissbier/weizen/wheat beer | 229.9 | 306.6 |
Other dark beer | 42.5 | 73.6 |
Stout | 429.3 | 575.5 |
Non-/low-alcohol | 350.2 | 267.9 |
Beer | 59,028.5 | 71,391.2 |
Source: Euromonitor International – The Market for Alcoholic Drinks in the USA, 2004 |
Estimated brewers’ production (million barrels) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Domestic Brewers | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003E | 2003E (Capacity) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anheuser-Busch(c) | 96.8 | 99.2 | 100.4 | 102.5 | 103.3 | 109.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SABMiller(d)(h) | 41.3 | 39.8 | 39.6 | 39.0 | 37.7 | 54.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coors | 22.0 | 22.9 | 22.7 | 22.7 | 22.3 | 26.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pabst(d) | 13.3 | 10.7 | 9.3 | 8.8 | 8.2 | 0.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yuengling | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Boston Beer(e) | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Latrobe | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Genesee/Highfalls | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 3.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pittsburgh | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hudepohl Schoenling | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stroh/Heileman(a)(d) | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heileman(a)(b) | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All Others | 7.8 | 7.9 | 8.1 | 7.8 | 7.5 | 10.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Totals | 186.4 | 185.7 | 185.3 | 186.2 | 184.2 | 212.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(a) Stroh acquired Heileman in July 1996. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(b) Beginning in 1991, excludes Pittsburgh. For 1990, had Pittsburgh been excluded, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
comparable volume would have been 11.3 million barrels. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(c) Anheuser-Busch announced a 1.1 million barrel inventory adjustment in 1995. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(d) Pabst acquired Stroh in 1999 except for Henry Weinhard and Mickey\'s which Miller pur-chased. Miller also purchased Pabst\'s Old English and Hamm\'s brands. Miller announced a 0.2 million barrel inventory reduction in the fourth quarter of 2000. Pabst closed its last remaining brewery in 2001. All brands are now brewed under contract by Miller. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(e) Beginning in 1997, Boston Beer shipments include third-party contract brewing. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(g) Based on preliminary data supplied by Bureau of the Census. Subject to revision. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(h)South African Breweries merged with Miller Brewing Company in June 2002 to become SABMiller. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sources: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census, Beer Institute, Davenport estimates |
Estimated brewers’ market share of domestic consumption(a) | |||||
1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003E | |
Anheuser-Busch | 49.0% | 19.7% | 50.0% | 50.4% | 51.1% |
Miller(b)(c) | 20.9% | 20.0% | 19.7% | 19.2% | 18.7% |
Coors(c) | 11.1% | 11.5% | 11.3% | 11.2% | 11.1% |
Pabst(b) | 6.7% | 5.4% | 4.6% | 4.3% | 4.1% |
Boston Beer(f) | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.6% |
Yuengling | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.6% | 0.6% |
Latrobe | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.4% |
Genesee/Highfalls | 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.5% | 0.4% | 0.4% |
Pittsburgh | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% |
Hudepohl Schoenling | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% |
Stroh/Heileman(e) | - | - | - | - | - |
Heileman(d)(e) | - | - | - | - | - |
Others, Net | 9.6% | 10.6% | 11.9% | 12.4% | 12.6% |
(a) Domestic consumption includes imports and excludes tax-free exports, military and non-alcoholic brews. | |||||
(b) Includes brands acquired from Stroh in 1999. | |||||
(c) Miller acquired rights to distribute Molson in U.S. in 1993. Coors acquired rights to diStribute Molson in January 2001. Both Miller and Coors market share exclude Molson USA. | |||||
(d)Helleman includes Schmidt, acquired in May 1987, and Pittsburgh. | |||||
(e) Stroh acquired Helleman in July 1996. | |||||
(f) Beginning in 1997, Boston Beer includes third-party contract brewing. | |||||
Source: Davenport & Co. estimates |
Top 10 domestic brands (million barrels) | |||||
Brand | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003E |
Bud Light | 28.4 | 31.5 | 34.2 | 37.0 | 37.9 |
Budweiser | 36.5 | 35.4 | 34.3 | 33.0 | 31.8 |
Coors Light | 15.9 | 16.7 | 16.8 | 17.0 | 16.7 |
Miller Franchise* | 16.6 | 16.5 | 15.8 | 15.4 | 15.9 |
A-B Natural Light | 7.7 | 8.0 | 8.2 | 8.3 | 8.3 |
Busch | 8.0 | 7.8 | 7.6 | 7.3 | 6.9 |
Miller High Life | 5.4 | 5.2 | 5.6 | 5.8 | 5.7 |
Busch Light | 5.2 | 5.3 | 5.5 | 5.7 | 5.7 |
Milwaukee’s Best | 6.3 | 6.1 | 5.9 | 5.7 | 5.4 |
Miller Genuine Draft | 5.8 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 5.2 | 4.4 |
Total | 135.8 | 138.0 | 139.4 | 140.4 | 138.7 |
Source: Davenport & Co. estimates |
Top 10 micro/craft beer brands | ||
Brand | Dollar sales (in millions) |
% change vs. year ago |
SIERRA NEVADA PALE ALE | $44.7 | 4.7 |
SAMUEL ADAMS BOSTON LAGER | $43.4 | (1.9) |
SAMUEL ADAMS LIGHT | $20.6 | 72.4 |
SAMUEL ADAMS SEASONAL | $16.7 | (3.1) |
NEW BELGIUM FAT TIRE AMBER ALE | $14.9 | 15.0 |
REDHOOK ESB | $13.9 | (1.0) |
SHINER BOCK | $13.5 | (1.9) |
WIDMER HEFEWEIZEN | $12.5 | 21.6 |
PYRAMID HEFEWEIZEN ALE | $6.4 | (0.5) |
ALASKAN AMBER | $6.1 | 19.9 |
Total | $383.1 | 3.6 |
Source: Information Resources Inc., Total U.S. Food, Drug and Mass Merchandise (excluding Wal-Mart) for the 52 weeks ending Jan. 25, 2004. Products ranked by current 52-week dollar sales. |
Top 10 import beer brands | ||
Brand | Dollar sales (in millions) |
% change vs. year ago |
CORONA EXTRA | $428.1 | 4.0 |
HEINEKEN | $257.4 | 6.4 |
CORONA LIGHT | $96.7 | 12.4 |
TECATE | $74.7 | 6.5 |
LABATT BLUE | $58.9 | 2.8 |
AMSTEL LIGHT | $45.1 | 7.3 |
BECKS | $43.7 | 2.4 |
FOSTERS LAGER | $43.3 | (8.8) |
GUINNESS DRAUGHT | $38.1 | 8.8 |
PACIFICO | $34.5 | 6.6 |
Source: Information Resources Inc., Total U.S. Food, Drug and Mass Merchandise (excluding Wal-Mart) for the 52 weeks ending Jan. 25, 2004. Products ranked by current 52-week dollar sales. |