Container Demand Grows, but Sizes Shrink
By Sarah Theodore
Plastic containers are
leading the 1.7 percent annual growth in U.S. beverage packaging, according
to the Beverage Containers study recently published by the Freedonia Group, an
industrial market research firm in Cleveland, Ohio.
With a predicated 4.9 percent annual growth rate
between 2002 and 2007, plastic beverage packaging, which includes pouches,
far outpaces the expected growth in metal containers (0.5 percent per
year), glass (1.1 percent per year) and paperboard packages (-0.1 percent
per year).
While more beverages are finding their way into plastic bottles,
the size per unit continues to shrink, according to the study. In 1992, the
beverage industry packaged 10 billion gallons of product in plastic, with an
average of 70.2 ounces per unit. Ten years later, 17.5 billion gallons made
it into plastic containers, but the ounces-per-unit measurement dropped to 41.6.
By 2007, it is expected that 20.4 billion gallons will be packaged in plastic
containers, with an average 38.1 ounces per unit.
Soft drinks are most commonly packaged in plastic,
with 25.9 billion units used in 2002, and an expected 30.5 billion in 2007.
But water is growing just as quickly, with 12 billion units in 2002, and
17.3 billion predicated for 2007. Milk is gaining a little more slowly,
with an expected 1.6 billion-unit increase to 8.5 billion units in 2007,
and fruit beverages will increase from 4.2 billion to 5.6 billion units in
2007, according to the report.
An example of the shrinking size of plastic packaging can be found in the new PET packages
introduced by Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated, based in Charlotte, N.C.
The company created 12-ounce PET soft drink and bottled water bottles for
multipacks, and in an effort to target female consumers with smaller
packaging, developed a 390-ml. single-serve bottle for the convenience
store segment.
Although not measured in the Freedonia report, spirits companies
are increasingly considering plastic for their products. Brown-Forman recently
launched its Canadian Mist, Southern Comfort and Early Times products in new
750-ml. PET bottles. The company worked with Amcor to take the brands from 750-ml.
stock containers to customized packages that match Brown-Forman’s 1.75-liter
PET bottles. The new Canadian Mist bottle features a sleek, indented grip and
an asymmetrical body. The companies were able emboss fine details in the shoulder
of the Early Times bottle, and Southern Comfort features insets and a sculpted
edge similar to the brand’s glass packaging.
In addition to embossing and debossing capabilities, plastic
packaging lends itself to colorful shrinkwrapping. Seal-It, Farmingdale, N.Y.,
recently introduced heat-shrink labels with thermochromatic inks. The temperature-sensitive
inks change color when subjected to either hot or cold.
“The marketing potential for this ink technology is enormous,”
the company said in a recent announcement. “Imagine a manufacturer wanting to
promote its product with a game that includes a secret code printed on the label.
The consumer is instructed to put the product in the freezer in order to see
the code and see if he won a prize.”
Alcoa Inc., Richmond, Va., also produces shrink labels and says
it has two new printing technologies used at its Downingtown, Pa., plant. The
company uses reverse-printed inks and has an interference “flip” ink that changes
from one color to another as the label is tilted. It also has a pearlescent
white ink that can be surface-printed for dramatic graphic depth.
Another new concept is the round PET bottle created by
Luca Casini Design Studio in Milan. The innovative round bottle is patented
but has not yet been used for a product, the company says. Designer Luca
Casini says the bottle was created with
multiple variations for the base, and the shape was “adopted for low
gas dispersion attributes, pressure resistance and for its visual
impact”.
Although the design is not yet in commercial use, Casini has
several ideas, including fruit juice packaged like fresh fruit. “We thought
it would have been interesting to use the ’net’ normally used for oranges or
lemons,” he says. “Could you imagine the power of an orange juice in a similar
orange frosted bottle in a ’net’ colored pack?”
Metal Picks Up The Pace
Demand for metal beverage containers has grown consistently
over the years, albeit more slowly than plastic containers, and the average
container size has remained at 12 ounces per unit, according to the Freedonia
study. In 1992, demand was 97 billion containers, and grew to 100.2 billion
a decade later. Demand is expected to reach 102.6 billion in 2007.
Soft drinks, as they did for plastic containers, make
up the bulk of metal container demand, with double the use of the beer
industry. And demand for soft drink cans is increasing at a faster pace,
perhaps due to successful new refrigerated multipacks and aluminum bottle
cans. In 1997, the soft drink industry used 62.6 billion containers, which
increased by approximately 1.3 billion units by 2002. That figure is
expected to increase by almost 2.3 billion units by 2007 to a total of 66
billion units.
Demand for metal containers in the beer industry has
been declining for some time in favor of glass, and in some cases plastic,
and because overall beer production has slowed. Although that trend is
expected to continue, the pace of the decline is slowing. In 1992, demand
for beer cans was 38 billion units. In 1997, it had dropped to 32.7 billion
units, and 32 billion in 2002. Freedonia predicts that demand will only
drop another half-billion units by 2007.
Much of the innovation in metal packaging has been on
the secondary packaging side of the business, but Crown Beverage Packaging
USA, Philadelphia, recently introduced decorated SuperEnd beverage ends,
with a distinctive message or billboard area. The company says SuperEnds
feature an exclusive 45-degree countersink wall that can be used for brand
logos, special messages, co-branding
promotions, instant-win campaigns and other consumer messages.
“Decorated SuperEnd can ends offer a simple way for beverage
marketers to reinforce brand identity and drive product differentiation,” Thomas
Fischer, vice president of sales and marketing at Crown, said in a statement.
“This new capability provides additional value to SuperEnd beverage end users,
who already benefit from reduced material costs, enhanced package integrity
and improved end performance.”
Aluminum bottle-cans produced by companies such as CCL
Container and Cebal are also leading change in the metal container segment.
The cans can be custom-shaped like plastic bottles, they are lightweight,
chill quickly and are reclosable. Beverage-makers such as Snapple, Kraft
and Vincor International have already used the bottle-cans to create
stand-out packaging for Snapple Elements, Capri Sun
and Tabu Vodka, respectively.
A Glass Half Full
Despite a turn to plastic for many packages formerly
packaged in glass, demand for glass containers continues to grow. In 1997,
27.8 billion glass containers were used by the beverage industry. By 2007,
Freedonia estimates the demand will be 28.7 billion units, and says the
conversion from glass to plastic has largely been completed.
Beer represents the largest share of glass demand,
with about 18 billion units more than the wine industry. What the metal can
industry is losing in beer demand, the glass industry is picking up, at
about 1.2 billion units every five years. In 1997, the beer industry
used 19.2 billion glass bottles, and in 2007, that figure is expected to
increase to 21.7 billion.
Glass use by the wine industry has fluctuated,
reaching 2.03 billion units in 1997, 1.85 billion in 2002, and is expected
to rise back to 2.01 billion units in
2007.
Glass is still the ultimate in upscale packaging and
can be used in a variety of ways. Brands from spirits to soft drinks and
juice are using glass with paper labels, clear pressure-sensitive labels,
shrink labels and applied ceramic imaging.
Diageo this year rolled out Smirnoff Vodka flavor
“twists” such as Cranberry Twist in new glass bottles that
appear to be twisted in their mid-section. In addition to their unique
shape, the bottles feature clear, pressure-sensitive labels.
Thomas Kemper Sodas, premium soft drinks produced in Seattle,
are packaged in glass and recently rolled out new paper label graphics that
incorporate wood grain and brushed metal effects as well as a watermark icon.
In addition to featuring one of today’s hottest fruits, POM
Wonderful pomegranate juices are packaged in glass bottles shaped like stacked
pomegranates. The innovative bottle with ceramic graphics received one of the
Glass Packaging Institute’s Clear Choice awards last year.
What’s New In Paper?
Aseptic and bag-in-box packaging are expected to lead paperboard
container use in the beverage industry, while cartons and composite cans decline,
according to the Freedonia report.
Paperboard containers made nice gains between 1992 and
2002, when they grew by 2.2 billion units to 23.8 billion, overall. But by
2007, they are expected to drop to 23.7 billion units. Fruit beverages and milk are the top users of paperboard packaging, in both
cartons and aseptic boxes. But while juice is expected to continue to grow
from 9 billion units in 1992 to 12.6 billion in 2007, milk has consistently
dropped, and is expected to fall from 12.5
billion units in 1992 to 10.1 in 2007.
One beverage category that
is increasing its use of paperboard packaging in surprising new ways is
wine. Once the package of choice for less expensive wines,
“cask” packaging is making a comeback in premium products.
According to Scholle Corp., maker of bag-in-box
packaging for wine, 50 percent of wine in Australia is packaged in
bag-in-box, and only 18 percent in the United States. The package that is
expected to become most popular is the 3-liter cask, which is equal to four
bottles of wine. The package offers a lower price point, and the
vacuum-sealed bag prevents oxidation so wine lasts longer.
Canandaigua Wine Co. also is using paperboard
packaging for wine, with the introduction of a new 500-ml. single-serve
Tetra Prisma package from Tetra Pak. Almaden’s Red Sangria is the
first wine to use the octagonal-shaped Tetra Prisma package, which
Canandaigua says is perfect for on-the-go convenience. The wine will retail
for $3.49 per package.
“Canandagua Wine and Tetra Pak conducted consumer research that
demonstrated exceptionally high interest in this innovative packaging concept,”
said Diana Pawlik, brand manager for Almaden Vineyards, in a statement. “Both
overall appeal and purchase intent scores for the design of the package exceed
industry benchmark targets.”
It’s In The Bag
Old-fashioned tea bags are going high-tech thanks to
two companies that are using new triangle-shaped tea bags. Revolution Tea,
Tempe, Ariz., and Ames International Tea Division, Seattle, have each
rolled out versions of the new bags.
Revolution Tea’s Pyramid Bags are made from
nylon and filled with full-leaf tea. The bags are packed in another
innovative package, the T-Pot Revolution Retail Tin, a stay-fresh container
that the company says can be used for secondary storage of spices and
herbs.
Ames International says its Teaosophy pyramid-shaped
mesh tea bags allow water to circulate around the leaves, making them
“dance” or expand and move freely in a way that traditional
flat bags do not.
“The larger leaves and tea pod allow drinkers to
control the infusion of the tea — regulating its flavor and
intensity, and eliminating the infusion of any chemicals or paper remnants
that can steep into the tea from paper dip-and-go bags,” says Amy
Paulose, vice president of brand development at Ames International.
“The result is loose tea’s robust flavors with the convenience of a tea bag.”
U.S. beverage container demand (Billion units) | |||
Item | 2002 | 2007 | % annual growth 2002 to 2007 |
Metal | 100.2 | 102.6 | 1.7 |
Plastic | 53.8 | 68.5 | 4.9 |
Glass | 27.2 | 28.7 | 1.1 |
Paper | 23.8 | 23.7 | -0.1 |
Total demand | 205.0 | 223.5 | 1.7 |
Source: The Freedonia Group, Cleveland, Ohio |
Plastic beverage container demand by market | |||
Item | 1997 | 2002 | 2007 |
Beverages packaged in plastic (billions of gallons) | 14.0 | 17.5 | 20.4 |
Ounces per unit | 50.3 | 41.6 | 38.1 |
Plastic beverage container demand (millions of units) | 35,665 | 53,835 | 68,535 |
Soft drinks | 20,500 | 25,900 | 30,500 |
Water | 4,800 | 12,030 | 17,300 |
Milk | 5,900 | 6,915 | 8,530 |
Fruit beverages | 2,360 | 4,810 | 6,590 |
Other | 2,105 | 4,180 | 5,615 |
Source: The Freedonia Group, Cleveland, Ohio |
Metal beverage container demand by market | |||
Item | 1997 | 2002 | 2007 |
Beverages packaged in metal (millions of gallons) | 9,360 | 9,447 | 9,691 |
Ounces per unit | 12.1 | 12.1 | 12.1 |
Metal beverage container demand (millions of units) | 98,895 | 100,210 | 102,640 |
Soft drinks | 62,600 | 63,900 | 66,170 |
Beer | 32,700 | 32,000 | 31,500 |
Other | 3,595 | 4,310 | 4,970 |
Source: The Freedonia Group, Cleveland, Ohio |
Glass beverage container demand by market | |||
Item | 1997 | 2002 | 2007 |
Beverages packaging in glass(millions of gallons) | 3,521 | 3,316 | 3,490 |
Ounces per unit | 16.2 | 15.6 | 15.6 |
Glass beverage container demand (millions of units) | 27,768 | 27,245 | 28,655 |
Beer | 19,200 | 20,500 | 21,700 |
Wine | 2,030 | 1,850 | 2,010 |
Other | 6,538 | 4,895 | 4,945 |
Source: The Freedonia Group, Cleveland, Ohio |
Paperboard beverage container demand by market | |||
ITEM | 1997 | 2002 | 2007 |
Beverages packaged in paper (millions of gallons) | 4,233 | 4,174 | 4,250 |
Ounces per unit | 23.0 | 22.4 | 23.0 |
Paperboard beverage container demand (millions of units) | 23,576 | 23,845 | 23,700 |
Fruit beverages | 11,645 | 12,120 | 12,550 |
Milk | 11,600 | 10,900 | 10,130 |
Other | 331 | 825 | 1,020 |
Source: The Freedonia Group, Cleveland, Ohio |